Making the Case for Conflict Sensitivity in Security and Justice Sector Reform Programming
Suggested Citation: Goldwyn, Rachel. “Making the Case for Conflict Sensitivity in Security and Justice Sector Reform Programming.” A Conflict, Crime, and Violence Results Initiative (CCVRI) product. London, UK: DFID and Care International UK, 2013.
Related Publications
African Conflict Baselines and Trends: Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset – Overview, Uses and Applications
Back to Basics: A Compilation of Best Practices in Design, Monitoring and Evaluation in Fragile and Conflict-affected Environments
Defining and Measuring the External Stress Factors that Lead to Conflict in the Context of the Post-2015 Agenda
Evaluating Impacts of Peacebuilding Interventions: Approaches and Methods, Challenges and Considerations
Evidence Based Crime Prevention Policymaking: Promising Practices and Opportunities
Integrated Development and Peacebuilding Programming: Design, Monitoring and Evaluation
Measuring the Un-Measurable: Solutions to Measurement Challenges in Fragile and Conflict-affected Environments
Monitoring and Evaluating Conflict Sensitivity: Methodological Challenges and Practical Solutions
Practical Approaches to Theories of Change in Conflict, Security and Justice Programs Part I: What they are, different types, how to develop and use them
Practical Approaches to Theories of Change in Conflict, Security, and Justice Programs Part II: Using Theories of Change in Monitoring and Evaluation
Tools for Measurement, Monitoring and Evaluation: Making Conflict, Crime and Violence Data Usable